An analysis of peak lumbar load data collected from the existing peer-reviewed literature on rear impact crash tests was performed. Values for peak lumbar tension/compression, peak lumbar sagittal forces, and peak lumbar flexion/extension moments were aggregated from each study. The trends in the accumulated data were analyzed as functions of the changes in velocity (delta-Vs) measured during the crash tests. The data were further analyzed to identify differences in trends found across variations in the testing conditions used across studies. These testing conditions included type of anthropometric test device (ATD) used, type of ATD pelvis used, ATD seating position, production year of seat used, type of seat used, and type of seat restraint used. Data were also aggregated from peer-reviewed research quantifying peak lumbar compression in human subjects performing various tasks, including activities of daily living (ADLs), tasks related to sports and exercise, and industrial tasks typical of manual labor. The peak lumbar compression data from rear impact tests with ATDs was compared with the corresponding peak load data from the studies with human subjects. Linear regressions of the aggregated data from rear impact crash tests with impact severities between 5-45 km/h indicated some relationships between peak lumbar loads and delta-V. However, the relatively low R2 values observed from these regressions suggest that other variables may contribute to the variance in peak lumbar loading with respect to delta-V. It appears that individuals performing ADLs may experience peak lumbar compression similar to the compression measured in ATDs in rear impact crash tests with impact severities between 5-45 km/h. Aggregated peak lumbar compressive loading values in tasks related to sports, exercise, and industry were largely greater than the aggregated peak loads from crash testing.
04.11.2023
Aggregation of Lumbar Loads in Rear Impact Crash Tests
Contributor
Judson B. Welcher, Ph.D
Dr. Judson Welcher is a Biomechanical Engineer and Accident Reconstructionist with Aperture (formerly Biomechanical Research and Testing). Judson has been employed in the field of biomechanical engineering and accident reconstruction for over 28 years. He specializes in trauma causation and prevention, human tolerance, restraint design, instrumented testing with humans and anthropomorphic test devices), accident reconstruction, and amusement park rider tolerances. Judson has consulted on thousands of civil and criminal forensic cases; he has testified in local, state, and federal courts regarding accident reconstruction and biomechanical engineering across the country. Judson has qualified and testified as an expert in over 200 trials.
Related Insights
All Insights
Firm News |
10.29.2026
Geotechnical Engineering Statement of Qualifications
Explore Aperture’s geotechnical engineering capabilities, technical experts, and representative projects involving foundations, slopes, retaining walls, and soil-related failures. ...Read Full Article from Geotechnical Engineering Statement…
Firm News |
10.01.2026
What Four Years on Mt. Ararat Taught Me About the Scientific Method
John Bryant reflects on four years of fieldwork on Mt. Ararat and the lessons the search for Noah’s Ark reinforced about evidence, objectivity, and the…
Firm News |
08.31.2026
Aperture, LLC. Names J. Donald Fancher President & CEO; Robert E. Joyce, Jr. to Transition to Board of Directors
ARLINGTON, Texas – Aperture, LLC (“Aperture”), a Genstar Capital portfolio company and a full-service provider of forensic expertise and litigation dispute support services, today announced…